Country, Cosmos, and Continuity: Indigenous Australian Art as Living Knowledge: Mayatili Marika

It is an extraordinary moment in history to be Indigenous Australian. Only a generation or
two ago, our forebears, living forty, fifty, or sixty years in the past, could scarcely have
imagined that artworks created by Indigenous peoples from remote regions of the Australian
continent would one day hang on the walls of homes, galleries, and major art institutions
across the world. These works are not merely aesthetic objects; they are visual articulations
of ancient knowledge systems and expressions of an inextricable interconnection between
people, Country, and the cosmos. Their global celebration stands in stark contrast to the lived
realities Indigenous Australians have endured, and continue to endure, under the ongoing
structures of colonisation.

Indigenous Australian paintings are visually powerful: vibrant, dynamic, and assured. They
employ colour, texture, bold brushwork, and intricate geometric configurations of dots, lines,
and patterns with a freedom and authority rarely replicated elsewhere. These works and their
creators stand confidently alongside Western classical masters and contemporary global art
figures. Today, audiences far beyond Central and Western Desert communities recognise
names such as Emily Kam Kngwarreye, Bill Whiskey Tjapaltjarri, Walimpirrnga Tjapaltjarri,
Johnny Warangkula Tjupurrula, Carlene West, and Timo Hogan.

Crucially, Indigenous Australian art resists categorisation within Western art’s historical
movements. It cannot be neatly contained within frameworks such as modernism, abstraction,
or abstract expressionism. These works exist on their own terms, emerging from
epistemologies that long predate Western art theory. Their power lies precisely in this refusal
to conform: they are grounded in knowledge systems that are ancient, continuous, and living.

The global resonance of Indigenous Australian art highlights the intersection, and dialogue,
between Indigenous and Western worlds. It affirms that art transcends cultural and
geographic boundaries and functions as a universal language. One does not need to
understand every symbolic layer or cultural reference to be deeply moved by these works. Art
speaks intuitively, eliciting emotional and personal responses that are profoundly human. As
Pablo Picasso observed, “Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life.” This
understanding echoes the Socratic notion that wisdom begins not with certainty but with
wonder. Indigenous Australian art invites this openness, allowing meaning to emerge through
engagement rather than explanation.

Today, American collectors such as Steve Martin and Anne Stringfield, and John and Barbra
Wilkerson are drawn to the significant works of Indigenous Australian artists. Situated within
the broader global dialogue these works generate, their collections provide a framework
through which engagement can occur across considerable geographical, cultural, and
linguistic distance. Through careful stewardship, these two collections contribute to the
preservation of Indigenous Australian identity and knowledge systems, demonstrating how
meaning and responsibility may be recognised and upheld beyond their place of origin.

To engage with Indigenous Australian art more deeply requires recognising that these works
are not one-dimensional images. They operate simultaneously as visual language, historical
record, cartography, and philosophical text. Paintings can be read as songlines, complex oral narratives encoded visually, that map Country, articulate ancestral law, and delineate custodianship. They function as ceremonial scores and spatial maps that describe relationships between people, place, and the cosmos.

Indigenous Australian art is embedded with knowledge systems encompassing history,
philosophy, science, law, religion, cosmology, ecology, and kinship. Every mark carries
purpose. As Galileo Galilei noted, “All truths are easy to understand once they are
discovered; the point is to discover them.” Aristotle’s assertion that “all humans by nature
desire to know” resonates strongly here, though Indigenous knowledge is not abstracted from
life; it is lived, enacted, sung, and painted. While today acrylic paint and canvas are
commonly used, these materials represent a relatively recent adaptation. For tens of
thousands of years, artists sourced ochres and clays from the land, grinding them into
pigments mixed with organic binders. Artistic expression occurred on bodies, ceremonial
objects, bark, cave walls, trees, sand, and earth itself. These practices were, and remain,
mechanisms of knowledge transmission, ensuring cultural continuity long before Western
records, citizenship, or art markets existed.

Across the vast geographical diversity of Indigenous Australia, from the red deserts of the
continent’s interior to azure northern coastlines, art articulates identity, belonging, and
relationality. At its core lies a foundational philosophical principle: interconnectedness.
Indigenous epistemologies recognise that all beings, human and non-human, terrestrial and
celestial, exist within a unified cosmological system. This reflects Aristotle’s understanding
that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts; Indigenous art gives this principle lived and
visual form.

Paintings map constellations and star paths alongside rivers, waterholes, and ancestral tracks.
They encode seasonal cycles, ecological knowledge, and kinship systems, revealing the
relational frameworks that govern social, spiritual, and environmental life. These are not
static representations; they are living documents of ceremony, law, language, dance, and
cosmology. Time itself is understood as elastic, collapsing past, present, and future into a
single continuum. As Søren Kierkegaard observed, “Life can only be understood backwards;
but it must be lived forwards,” a temporal paradox long embedded in Indigenous worldviews,
where ancestral pasts guide present responsibility and future obligation.

These understandings are the product of over 65,000 years of continuous knowledge
transmission. Oral histories are sung into the land through songlines of immense complexity,
comparable in scale and sophistication to the great epic traditions of the world, including The
Iliad, The Odyssey, Beowulf, and the Mahabharata. Indigenous Australian art is therefore
both archive and enactment, memory and futurity—Ancestral pasts and Ancestral futures
simultaneously.

Western intellectual traditions have long grappled with similar ideas of interconnectedness.
Leonardo da Vinci’s concept of connessione recognised that art, science, nature, and
humanity exist within a single unified system. Indigenous Australians have always known
this to be true. Yet where Western thought often separates disciplines into discrete categories,
Indigenous Australian art speaks across them simultaneously. Knowledge is not fragmented
but relational. In this sense, Beethoven’s declaration that music is “a higher revelation than
all wisdom and philosophy” resonates deeply: for Indigenous Australians, art is philosophy
embodied, law sung, and history made visible.

To fully understand the significance of Indigenous Australian art’s global recognition, it is
necessary to confront Australia’s colonial history. Colonisation was not a singular historical
event but an ongoing structure designed to erase Indigenous knowledge, language, culture,
and sovereignty. The legal doctrine of terra nullius denied the existence of sophisticated
societies that had flourished for at least 65,000 years. Despite this, over 300 distinct nations
occupied the continent, each with its own laws, languages, and territories. British notions of
ownership, based on extraction and exploitation, stood in direct opposition to Indigenous
custodianship grounded in care, reciprocity, and responsibility to Country.

The expansion of colonial settlements brought dispossession, frontier violence, massacres,
and forced removals. Resistance was widespread and sustained, yet this history has often
been marginalised within Australian education. The struggle for Land Rights, exemplified by
the Yirrkala Bark Petitions, the Wave Hill Walk-Off, and the Mabo decision, demonstrates
the enduring assertion of Indigenous law, much of it articulated through art and cultural
practice.

Despite legal recognition, the impacts of colonisation remain deeply entrenched. Indigenous
Australians continue to experience profound disparities in health, education, justice, and life
expectancy. Languages and knowledge systems remain endangered, with each loss
representing the erosion of an irreplaceable intellectual archive. Yet despite these realities,
Indigenous Australian cultures and identity endure. Art remains a vital conduit through which
histories are preserved, identities affirmed, and futures imagined.

Indigenous Australian art is not merely representation; it is ontology. It articulates being
itself. Embedded within every mark, rhythm, and gesture is a living system of knowledge that
carries law, memory, responsibility, and futurity. These artworks do not simply depict
Country; they are Country, alive with ancestral presence, cosmological order, and relational
intelligence. They are not passive objects, but active agents in cultural continuity.

The Earth is our mother, and the land is our backbone. Waterways, stars, winds, animals,
plants, and people exist within a single, interdependent system. Indigenous Australian art
gives form to this understanding, making visible the unseen connections that bind all things.
Through painting, song, and ceremony, the land is sung into being, and in turn, it sings us.
This reciprocal relationship has sustained the world’s oldest continuing culture since time
immemorial.

In a world marked by ecological crisis and cultural disconnection, Indigenous Australian art
offers not only aesthetic power but philosophical guidance. It proposes an ethic and lens
grounded in care, custodianship, accountability, and relational responsibility. The growing
global recognition of Indigenous Australian art is therefore not merely an art market
phenomenon, but an acknowledgment of the enduring relevance of Indigenous knowledge
systems within contemporary discourse.

Despite the ongoing impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Australian culture endures. Art
remains a vital conduit through which histories are preserved, identities affirmed, and futures
imagined.

We are descendants of our ancestors, and in turn, we will become the ancestors of future
generations. The choices we make now shape those futures—an infinite congruence of
Ancestral pasts and Ancestral futures.

Indigenous Australian art stands as a declaration of survival, sovereignty, and continuity. It
asserts our place within the Australian landscape, the global human story, and the wider
cosmos, ensuring that our surviving cultures, languages, and knowledge systems remain
alive, dynamic, and unbroken.

 

  • Mayatili Marika

    Mayatili Marika (she/her) is a Rirratjingu Traditional Owner and Yolŋu woman based in remote north east Arnhem Land, Northern Territory....

    Mayatili Marika (she/her) is a Rirratjingu Traditional Owner and Yolŋu woman based in remote north east Arnhem Land, Northern Territory. Part of a new generation of leadership for Yolŋu people, Mayatili is a bilingual leader, advocate and cultural ambassador who is deeply involved in the multifaceted education pipeline for Indigenous people.

    Mayatili has been working closely with major domestic and international art institutions and many commercial galleries in Australia and the US. As a curator of exhibitions, including the recent groundbreaking and critically acclaimed US travelling exhibition Madayin: Eight Decades of Aboriginal Australian Bark Painting from Yirrkala. She has been the Cultural Curator and programmer of the Garma Festival, for over a decade (Australia’s largest annual indigenous event) in North East Arnhem Land.

    In all her work, Mayatili is a cultural conduit who is committed to elevating and amplifying the voices of Indigenous Australians.